Archive for the ‘Supplements’ Category
Well, it’s always a good time to think about vitamin D, but since we’re heading into November fast, its now that those great vitamin D levels of the summer (that is, if you actually got out into the sun this summer) start waning. Vitamin D is used in a myriad of mechanisms throughout the body. Since you’re been paying attention to this blog, you know how important it is.
The ‘new’ things in this post aren’t all that different than what you’ve been hearing me harp on for months now, but I did come across a few things I hadn’t seen:
- University of California San Diego and Grassroots health have teamed up again to present an updated set of video seminars on the latest vitamin D research:
Here are a few teasers:
Vitamin D: Nutrient, Not A Drug
- Our favorite ‘just outside the mainstream’ doctor – Joseph Mercola – has a great Vitamin D resource center on his website. He keep it all fresh and is always on the lookout for the new evidence:
Keep that 25 (OH) Vitamin D level above 60. You can thank me later.
Sean Croxton at Underground Wellness has done it again. Careful readers of my blog will know I refer to him frequently and read him often. He recently interviewed Julie Matthews. Ms. Matthews is the author of Nourishing Hope for Autism.
|Nourishing Hope for Autism: Nutrition Intervention for Healing Our Children|
As friends of parents of children who are living with autism, I have a very tenuous, tangential view of the challenges families raising children with autism have.
Ms. Matthews offers a refreshing view on the genesis of autism and approaches that can ameliorate the condition. Given the explosion of autism diagnoses in recent years, this is a topic that will likely touch us all.
Take a listen to the interview and my hope it this will at least educate you and at best provide some help.
See more about Ms. Matthews work at http://nurishinghope.com.
Now some welcome news for a change. this one comes from the good ‘ol mainstream press:
Seems researchers found a strong correlation between reduced breast cancer risk and regular supplementation with fish oil. The study was conducted by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center a short drive from my house in Seattle (was that too much self-disclosure?).
Here’s the salient finding:
When the researchers looked at the women who took the fish oil supplements, they found they had a 32 percent reduced risk of breast cancer, which appeared to be restricted to invasive ductal breast cancer, the most common type.
It would be disingenuous of me not to point out the shortcomings of this finding (since I’m so quick to point out shortcomings of announcements with which I disagree). This does not appear to have been a controlled study - these same women who take the fish oil may also practice more healthy behavior overall than those who didn’t take the fish oil. It should also be noted this correlation does not, in and of itself, establish causation (i.e. one can’t infer that taking fish oil causes the reduce incidence of breast cancer).
All that said, I think it’s certainly a worthwhile thing to consider. You know, talk to your doctor and all that.
Here’s the link to the study abstract for good measure. The full text appears to be behind a pay wall, so if you want to see the whole study, you’ll have to bum a copy off of your local neighborhood oncologist.
p.s. I’m posting this while 36,000 ft over southern Oregon via the extra minty fresh GoGo In-Flight wi-fi service on my flight from San Diego. Will wonders ever cease?
An article on the NPR blog caught my eye today:
Well, the headline got it right, but when you read the post, you get the same yadda, yadda about ‘lowering caloric input,’ ‘avoiding fat,’ and ‘exercising more.’
Just another reminder to look the other way when you hear the conventional wisdom. There is a new wave coming. Stick with me and I’ll keep you right out front on the leading edge.
Interestingly, the article does not appear with the link above any more. Here’s the article I coped from my
Our workouts aren’t keeping up with our pig-outs.
That fitness routine is soooo not working. More Americans are spending some of their leisure time exercising, yet folks just keeps piling on the pounds.
Here are the cold, hard facts. About 35 percent of adults engage regularly in physical activity when they’re not working, according to estimates based on a 2009 nationwide survey. That’s up from 32 percent in 2008.
Now, what’s the scale tell us? Not good. More people in the U.S. are obese than ever. In 2009, about 28 percent of people in the U.S. were obese, up a fraction of a percent from 2008.
But hop in the Wayback Machine and check the weights in 1997. Nineteen percent of people in the U.S. were considered obese then.
There’s not a moment to lose in doing something to reverse the weight trend. A recent study found that a substantial decline in the rate of heart attacks could be fleeting as obesity and diabetes become more prevalent.
Exercise can only burn so many calories. Eating better is crucial. Recommendations for new nutritional guidelines would cut saturated fats even more than in the past and promote healthier foods, like fruits and vegetables.
But maybe you want to try some more reps of that time-honored weight-loss exercise move — pushing back from the dinner table.
What you *really* need to do to be healthy (which, by the way, will lead to healthy weight) is drastically reduce carbohydrate consumption (eliminate sweets and processed carbs), get your inflammation down (principally by upping your Omega-3 and reducing your Omega-6), getting your Vitamin D in a good range (50ng/ml, remember?) and lifting heavy things on a regular basis (see my BBS posts).
None of this aerobics and calorie restriction, OK?
Well, they hockey team I grew up rooting for growing up in Chicago (I was joking that I was a fan so long ago, it was before the Espositos went to the Bruins) has won the Stanley Cup for the first time in almost 50 years.
Fitting now that I post about their being the first ‘Vitamin D’ team to win a championship.
Check out this article from the Vitamin D council ont he subject.
Wonder if Dr. Joseph Mercola had anything to do with this (having his practice in Chicago, and all).
No doubt will inspire others.
By the way, if you want to see the clinical evidence, take a look:
Athletic performance and vitamin D
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D may improve athletic performance in vitamin D-deficient athletes. Peak athletic performance may occur when 25(OH)D levels approach those obtained by natural, full-body, summer sun exposure, which is at least 50 ng x mL
Seems every major media outlet has to have an obligatory ‘be afraid of vitamins’ article/editorial periodically. It’s almost as if the folks a PhRMA have a database to keep track of this stuff:
PhRMA Rep Dude: Hello newspaper/TV/radio Publisher Guy. We noticed that, even though our members have booked an obscene amount of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical ads with your company, we notice you have not recently scared the electrolytes out of your readers/viewers by telling them the will die if they take vitamin C.
Publisher Guy: Oh, my apologies, PhRMA Rep Dude, we’ll get right on it. In fact, we have a set of stock editorials from which we pull this content to publish periodically. What with all the terror scares, economic re-meltdown, deadly earthquakes/aftermaths, mortgage crisis, undersea oil gushers and Jon & Kate news, it must have slipped off the queue momentarily. Rest, assured, we’ll get that one up right away.
PhRMA rep dude: You would do well to make good on this, Publisher Guy. You know we’re subsidizing the last two ‘real news’ reporters on staff. Hop to it.
So what’s got me spinning out on a random association tangent today? This ‘editorial’ in USA today:
Our view on pills and potions: Do you really know what’s in that dietary supplement?
Here’s a fun little tidbit:
Researchers at an accredited lab working for Congress’ non-partisan Government Accountability Office recently found traces of potentially hazardous contaminants in almost all of the 40 supplement products tested.
“Mommy, Mommy, please protect me from that scary Vitamin E.”
It did not escape my notice that in this very same issue (6/8/2010), there were several ‘news’ articles extolling the virtues of the latest pharmaceutical drug that may extend life about four months if you (well, we mostly) spend about $30,000/month for the drug.
Let’s have a few numbers for perspective. Way back in 1999, the Institute of Medicine published a landmark book called To Err is Human. In it, among other things, it cited 98,000 deaths in the US caused by medical care. To be clear, this was not the total number of deaths from all causes, these were deaths directly attributable to contact with the medical care system. While the book did not tease out how many of these deaths were specifically related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs), it is well understood that ADRs are a significant contributor.
More recently (in 2008), in a study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (note: not published in the US) It is estimated 3% of all deaths in the general population of industrialized countries are as a result of adverse drug reactions. In the US, the conservative estimate puts us at about 70,000 deaths per year directly related to legal pharmaceutical drugs (total of 2.4 mm deaths/year in US). Contrast this with the number of deaths from vitamins/supplements (namely, –0- in the typical year) and it’s not hard to see that we have our scary headlines misplaced.
What I find even more remarkable is how little information there is out there that probes the issue of the safety of pharmaceuticals in aggregate. You’d think that if the Institute of Medicine estimates some large number of people are killed by sanctioned, ‘on-label’ use of pharmaceuticals, we would have studied it more, here eleven years on. The silence is deafening, to borrow a shop worn cliché.
Here is your takeaway: the next time you see the “What about the health risks of vitamins” headline (and, make no mistake, you will see them popping up like clockwork), remember two numbers: *70,000* and *0*.
At the risk of changing my ‘Health Man’ blog into the ‘Vitamin D’ blog, I come to you – once again – with more vital information about Vitamin D.
In a previous post, I make reference to mindboggling degree of Vitamin D deficiency among African-Americans – 97% are deficient. While we focus on African-Americans due to the relatively large population of Americans of African descent, these issues should be of concern for all people living in temperate climates with melanin-rich skin pigment.
Little did I know that in February of 2005, the Vitamin D council offered a publication titled: Racial Opportunities. In a very brief six pages, it wallops you with fact after fact, study after study that strongly correlates the much higher incidence of mortality and morbidity among African-Americans with their relatively poor Vitamin D status.
In the hopes of piquing your interest in reading this, here area a few stunners:
- Blacks are about ten times more likely to be vitamin D deficient than are whites.
- Vitamin D deficiency in African American mothers may explain the fact that black babies are more than twice as likely as whites to have low-birth-weights.
- Breast milk of black women often has undetectable levels of vitamin D.
- Fourteen diseases/conditions that have a higher incidence among African-Americans (eg, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity) also correlate with Vitamin D deficiency
This will take so little of your time to read. I hope it leads you to take ACTION.
Who needs to see yet another vitamin D post from me? Seems like I covered it all before. You may be saying ‘I get it already.’ Well, this time, the focus is a little more specific – it’s about giving our mothers and children their best shot at a healthy delivery.
In the April journal of the Obstetrics and Gynecological Survey, there was an alert put out to all Obstetricians, Gynecologists and Family Physicians regarding the mounting evidence of a a strong association between some common complications related to pregnancy and child birth (preeclampsia, spontaneous preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and fetal growth restriction) and the mother’s vitamin D levels.
In fact, they highlight the “significant, intractable disparities” that exist in rates of major pregnancy outcomes between black and white women. Given, as I have noted before, that only THREE PERCENT (3%) of black people in the US have sufficient levels of circulating Vitamin D, it should not be surprising that these scientists believe there may be a connection. You may recall that this ‘sufficiently’ level is 30 ng/mL which is still not optimal (50 ng/mL). While we do not have broadly-collected data on this statistic, one would expect the percentage of black people in the optimal range to be very close to –0-.
There is a summary of this report available on PubMed. Also, our just slightly offbeat, but always on point Dr. Joseph Mercola has a very comprehensive write up on the topic entitled "How Sunshine Can Prevent Birth Defects". Here’s just a sample of the things Dr. Mercola covers in this eye-opening article:
- Birth Defects
- Vitamin D Deficiency and Brain Damage
- Maternal Vitamin d Deficiency Causes Learning Disabilities
- Dyslexia, Poor School Attendance, Low Apgar Scores And Low Birth Weight
- African-Americans Are at a Much Higher Risk
- Severe Vitamin D Deficiency More Than 20 Times More Common in Young Black Women
You don’t have to wait for all the studies to come in. Hopefully I’ve convinced you to alert all those who are pregnant or thinking of becoming pregnant need to get their Vitamin D in to the optimal range (remember, 50ng/mL).
Here’s an innovative idea: let’s say you have one of those myriad ideas about how to keep people healthy that does not involve a new molecule (pharma) or zapping a patient with neutron gamma rays (medical devices). The oft-repeated lament is “Nobody’s gonna fund that, there’s no money in it!”
But if it’s dirt cheap and so helpful, you ought to be able to convince some large number of people (how presumably have been helped) to chip in to fund the research, huh?
Well, that’s the big idea at Grassroots Health (http://grassrootshealth.net). As far as I can tell, their only (first?) area of interest is in Vitamin D sufficiency (http://grassrootshealth.net/daction). They essentially have people sign up for $60/year. By signing up, members agree to participate in an observational study tracking circulating Vitamin D concentrations (25(OH)D) against a bunch of health conditions. The long-term plan is to build up enough cash to do a clinical trial of a to-be-determined design.
Could be the start of a new model – and give the disaffected throngs a way to push their priorities and note be dictated to by the medical-industrial complex.
Here’s a fantastic, one-day-only offer from one of my favorites. It’s Mark Sisson of Mark’s Daily Apple. You may recall I sent you his way in a previous post. Since then, I’ve been a regular reader and subscriber to his blog and have found the quality of his information to be superb and his style to be infectious. If you buy his book The Primal Blueprint from Amazon.com today (3/17/10), in addition to getting this life-changing book, you also get tons ‘o goodies along with it (cribbed from his announcement e-mail):
- A personal invite to a private 2-hour Live Webcast Q&A Session. Ask me anything you want. I’ll be answering as many questions as I can about weight loss, muscle building, supplementation and anything else that interests you.
- Access to the password-protected audio interview: "Special Report: 20 Reasons You’re Not Losing Weight (And How to Fix Them)" ($24.99 value, yours free!)
- Access to the password-protected audio interview: "Special Report: 5 Reasons You’re Sick (And How to Get Better)" ($14.99 value, yours free!)
- A convenient and exclusive e-book (PDF) of 25 Primal Blueprint Recipes from Mark’s Daily Apple
- A free preview edition (PDF) of my upcoming, hardbound cookbook with 5 select Primal Blueprint Recipes
You can get the full skinny (heh, he said skinny) at the ‘apple.’ The deal is even sweeter if you buy more books at a pop. The price of the book is paltry compared to its worth, and you get all this extra to boot. No excuse not to take advantage of this. Mark’s motivation is to raise the profile of his book so as to accelerate the broader changes we need to craft a healthier society. I’m down with that too.